Archive for the ‘Open Source’ Category

OnlineGroups.Net in the News

Sunday, September 23rd, 2007

The Sept. 19 issue of the NZ Herald quotes me as saying “Email has won”. It’s not actually my quote, or anything to do with lottery scams. It’s the reason that we’re doing OnlineGroups.Net and GroupServer. Email is the tool that is most used in people’s attempt to collaborate online, but it sucks for many to many messaging and file-sharing. The main problem is that email has no shared entitity for a group, and that’s what we provide. With GroupServer and OnlineGroups.Net, the group has a name, a url and an email address. Its messages, files, membership information are all visible online, to authorised users. People can participate in group conversations and file-sharing using both email and the Web. And all this can take place on a website that has regular pages and custom presentation. Sounds simple, yes? Well it’s taken us nearly four years but we’re nearly ready for prime time. Rebuilding registration is our last nasty task before we’ll be ready for tens of thousands of users. We’re also rebuilding the way groups are displayed, and adding a CMS/wiki-equivalent module. With plans for a release before Christmas, and to attract new site administrators to OnlineGroups.Net, you should be hearing a bit more from us online.

OnlineGroups.Net is Open for Business

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006

After nearly four years developing the underlying open source technology GroupServer, we decided that it’s too good to keep it to ourselves. Sure, there are variouls successful GroupServer sites but we figure that lots of people don’t want a whole installation, they just want some groups or a site. So we decided to build a site where they can have that. After many months of polishing the interface and building the ’shop’, OnlineGroups.Net is open for business.

OnlineGroups.Net allows you to create your own site and then add online groups. Sites and trial groups are free. Our online groups work equally via email and the web. There are other tools that provide this but we believe that OnlineGroups.Net has the most usable interface. What other tools don’t do is allow you to have your online groups on your own site. With a little help from us, OnlineGroups.Net sites can be completely customised.

We want to have tens of thousands of sites running on this service so that we can make GroupServer better faster, and build our specialised services business. So please, start a site and try out our online groups, tell us what you think of them and, if you like them, spread the good word (web feed).

Why GroupServer is Open Source

Sunday, February 26th, 2006

IOPEN and GroupSense have been working together for three years to develop GroupServer. We are launching a new brand OnlineGroups.Net to market services associated with GroupServer. GroupServer is open source. You can download it right now for free. You can modify the source, release or even sell the resulting software as long as you keep the licence intact.

Why do we do this?

We developed GroupServer for our client Advanced Business Education Ltd (ABEL). GroupServer is built from open source tools and components and is, itself open source.

Building GroupServer using open source components enabled us to deliver significant functionality very quickly and with minimal initial cost and development effort. The Zope web application framework, Apache web server and Postfix mail server all provide vital functionality to GroupServer. GroupServer also uses an open source email group component called Mailboxer. This enabled us to integrate email groups into a sophisticated web framework very quickly.

I can’t quantify how much slower or faster the development process might have been had we used proprietary components. It is likely, however that there would have been significant costs associated with obtaining them.

There were also significant benefits to the client in releasing the software we built for them as open source. When this was first negotiated, the client was willing to agree as there was no particular cost to them in releasing the software. The software does not provide any competitive advantage to them that could be compromised by its release.

The advantages, however became clear as soon as other customers of ours began to fund features. Those features appeared on the original client’s site, either for free or for the only the cost of implementing them.

Using open source rather than proprietary software also reduces the risk to our clients of being stuck with software that can not be maintained. Even if we are not available to maintain the source code, the client at least has the source code and can engage another vendor to maintain it. As the development community grows around the software, the risk to our clients of losing the business relationship with us will also reduce. There will be other people and teams around the world who will have experience working with the same software.

For more on what we have done for ABEL, see Chartered Cyber Course.

We are developing open source software for commercial reasons, not out of goodwill. Naturally, we, like any vendor, value goodwill in business relationships. We also enjoy being in the collaboration software business and working collaboratively together and with other companies. These things, however do not themselves put food on the table.

We are building open source software because we believe that, in the long term, this is the most commercially sustainable business model for generic software like ours. As the development community grows, it has the potential to develop a greater capacity than individual company to maintain the software. Even if this does not occur with our software, if it occurs with its competitors, then charging a licence fee would be a significant barrier to market uptake.

Software licensing is a small component of total cost of ownership. Whether software is free or not, organisations still invest in putting it in and then keeping it going. Once software becomes necessary to the business, there is significant value in support and maintenance.

The business opportunities in open source software are for services: consulting, integration, customisation, maintenance and support.

Some of this thinking, and comments from some of my Effusion Group buddies was recently quoted in a Computerworld open source feature that included these articles:

Elgg

Monday, October 10th, 2005

Elgg is an open source “learning landscape plaftform. It supports a social constructionist approach to eportfolios where learners link their ideas and interests with others’ as they evolve.

You can tag your interests and it shows you who else has the same interests. You can create individual and group blogs. Everything is linked by tags. Everything speaks RSS.

Strangely, there is no link to “home”, even on the logo at the top left.

[Added:] Is “eLearning” software becoming generic social software? This makes sense to me because we’ve built GroupServer to be a generic collaboration server. Even thought the original client for it is an eLearning provider, it has met their needs from the start.

Content is content, conversations are conversations. Groups and people are what they are.

Gatheroo: new community organizing and meeting site

Wednesday, July 13th, 2005

Chris Dykstra of Warecorp is one of the founders of Gatheroo, a new community meeting and organising site. It’s free to the people and groups who use it and is supported by providing highly targeted advertising.

Gatheroo is due to open in the (northern) fall. If you are interested, you can register now.

Gatheroo is built on top of open source collaboration platform CivicSpace.

I recently met Chris in Minneapolis. He is evaluating GroupServer for some significant projects in the US.

Open Source IM Clients

Tuesday, July 5th, 2005

I have been happily using Gaim for some time. An alternative is Miranda. Both are multi-protocol. Both are GPL. Gaim runs on Linux, BSD, MacOS X, and Windows. Miranda runs on Windows only. Both my kids happily use Gaim to chat with their MSIM friends.

Which do you prefer?

Which others should be compared with these?

SchoolTool

Tuesday, July 5th, 2005

I have been hearing about SchoolTool more often, lately.

They have a big vision: “a common information systems platform for school administration from California to Calcutta, via Cape Town! We hope to provide a single tool that will be readily adapted to the specific regulatory requirements and practices of different countries and regions, but that retains enough common functionality to make a shared development effort worthwhile.”

This makes sense to me as an ideal application for an Open Source approach. SchoolTool (like GroupServer) uses Zope and Python. It has a standards-based calendar module called SchoolBell.

Is anyone using SchoolTool in Aotearoa/NZ?

FreeMind

Tuesday, January 25th, 2005

I want to note some of the useful tools that I find here.

Top of the list is FreeMind, an open source mind-mapper. I am using it almost every time I want to take some notes or record and organise some ideas. I use it for my “to do list” and for planning various projects.

The real test for me: I am using it instead of grabbing a piece of scrap paper.

It uses Java so it runs equally well on Windows and Linux.

Moodle Conference happening in Feb 2005 in Rotorua

Monday, November 1st, 2004

Open Source eLearning Content Management System Moodle is gaining a strong user base in NZ. It has its own hosting and consulting company moodle.co.nz and is the focus of the Moodle Moot conference.

Useful RSS Reader: Sage

Monday, September 6th, 2004

It took me about five minutes to be converted to Sage. The first four minutes were the time it took me to download, install and configure it. An extension to Firefox (it works in Mozilla), Sage creates a panel to the left of the browser that lists RSS feeds and the titles of recent items in them. Click a feed on the left and the browser displays recent items with intros. Click an item title and browse the entire item. Such a simple way to provide four levels of detail.