<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Participative eDemocracy is coming to Canterbury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sociocorpus.net/2006/10/10/participative-edemocracy-is-coming-to-canterbury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sociocorpus.net/2006/10/10/participative-edemocracy-is-coming-to-canterbury/</link>
	<description>notes on the evolving life of the socius online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:36:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Roberts</title>
		<link>http://sociocorpus.net/2006/10/10/participative-edemocracy-is-coming-to-canterbury/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sociocorpus.net/2006/10/10/participative-edemocracy-is-coming-to-canterbury/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I wish you the best of luck  with the Canterbury issues forum and offer some advice from myself based on experience with the Newham issues forum and many years with other online communities.  
If you don&#039;t want to spend at least two years bumping along the bottom while building critical mass then I strongly suggest that you do NOT accept  the advice from Minneapolis which will be to set the default reply to individual senders  rather than to the group. This unnecessary obstacle has made persistent conversations few and far between in Newham, UK and you have a chance to get off to a better start than that by setting the norm as  group conversations rather than announcements that rapidly fizzle out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you the best of luck  with the Canterbury issues forum and offer some advice from myself based on experience with the Newham issues forum and many years with other online communities.<br />
If you don&#8217;t want to spend at least two years bumping along the bottom while building critical mass then I strongly suggest that you do NOT accept  the advice from Minneapolis which will be to set the default reply to individual senders  rather than to the group. This unnecessary obstacle has made persistent conversations few and far between in Newham, UK and you have a chance to get off to a better start than that by setting the norm as  group conversations rather than announcements that rapidly fizzle out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Randow</title>
		<link>http://sociocorpus.net/2006/10/10/participative-edemocracy-is-coming-to-canterbury/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Randow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sociocorpus.net/2006/10/10/participative-edemocracy-is-coming-to-canterbury/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>We had ten people at the public meeting. Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinegroups.net/r/post/141965&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;report on how the meeting went, and our plans&lt;/a&gt; from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had ten people at the public meeting. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://onlinegroups.net/r/post/141965" rel="nofollow">report on how the meeting went, and our plans</a> from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
